Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Ankermast (talk) 11:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: (Extended confirmed protection) Recent vandalism, he is related to Wars in Gaza and Ukraine. The Seal F1 (talk) 13:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring and possible sock-puppetry. Bored kittycat (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This is the second time I am requesting for this article to protected. My reason this time is still the same disruptive editing. Please, I want this article to be fully protected from this Vandalism. If this article remains not protected many harms will be done to it. Thank you. 2RDD (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 15:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returned after five years of protection. Entranced98 (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: LTA vandalism Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP BLP Vandalism. Suggest at least a two-week silver lock pbp 19:17, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Hacked account being used as a sockpuppet spamming the talk page with defamation and WP:BLP violations. Please can someone temp full lock it while they're sockpuppet investigation is taking place?. SummersRising (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Adding unsourced content claiming that a third female was born, this vandalizing has been done since at least September 2024. Fin 19:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA, thanks in advance. Smallangryplanet (talk) 19:35, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent LTA disruptive editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
There are citations needed for the section "For the fiscal year 2021, Amazon reported earnings of US$33.36 billion, with an annual revenue of US$469.82 billion, an increase of 21.7% over the previous fiscal cycle. Since 2007 sales increased from 14.835 billion to 469.822 billion, due to continued business expansion.[citation needed]"
I have found three references from bloggingwizard, investing.com and wallstreetnumbers.com that back those claims but I don't have permissions to add them.
For some reason I can't add full URLs here because I get a "spamblacklist" but happy to share. Joanfihu (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Investing.com is locally blacklisted. The other two don't seem to be on the local or global blacklists. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Administrators can't add blacklisted links to articles either. Use non-blacklisted sources, such as wallstreetnumbers. I'd avoid bloggingwizard. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
বাংলাদেশ ছাত্র মিশন is the Name Of বাংলাদেশ লেবার পার্টি's student wing. Therefore I would Like To make A Wikipedia Page. Mustafizur Rahman 2025 (talk) 14:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Mustafizur Rahman 2025: We do not accept non-English titles, and this is not the place to request the creation of a new page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- :@Mustafizur Rahman 2025: , in addition to what User:Jéské Couriano has told you, possibly you might be interested to work on Bangla Wikipedia (bn
.wikipedia .org). However please follow their notability and other guidelines and ask for help on Bangla Wikipedia's help desk if needed. (Pinging Bangla Wikipedia admin User:আফতাবুজ্জামান). Note: Follow-up questions or comments should take place on relevant user talk pages and help desks; Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- :@Mustafizur Rahman 2025: , in addition to what User:Jéské Couriano has told you, possibly you might be interested to work on Bangla Wikipedia (bn
Not done. This is the English Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
In paragraph titled "Eastern India" change "In Gangetic belt mainly in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Saraswat Brahmins were landlords and priests. They follow Shakta tradition, Vaishnavism and Shaivism." TO "In Gangetic belt mainly in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Saraswat Brahmins were landlords and priests. They follow Shakta tradition, Vaishnavism and Shaivism. Vaidya community of Bengal, a unique close-knit and aristocratic community, is a branch of this Saraswat Brahmin community with predominatly Shukla-Yajurvedi Kanva-shakha heritage .(It should be noted that Vaidya surname and some exclusive gotras like Dhanvantari are only found among Saraswats of other places, also many Saraswats claim descent from a Rajarshi Raja Rattan Sen) They were traditional teachers and practitioners of Ayurveda and it had become a family-tradition. The first flow of Vaidyas into Bengal came from South-western India via Orissa in early 11th century. They were called “Ambastha-Brahmin” because Ambastha was a place in Punjab where many Saraswat Brahmins including vaidyas resided . They named themselves after the name of their ancestral place. Ashwapati Sen, Adishur, Samanta Sen, the kings of the Sena dynasties were all Vaidyas coming from southern India. Later , king Adishur invited four more Vaidya pandits(of Dhanvantari, Shaktri, Moudgalya and Kashyapa gotra) from Kannauj (UP)." Raygs2810 (talk) 17:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Baidya is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Misleading and lacking infomation on the content of Mr. Cave's comments.
Lots of guilt by association, and not included that Murro has been rehabilitated
31.205.73.15 (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.